Jeremy Richardson

Senior energy analyst

Author image
Jeremy Richardson is a senior energy analyst in the Climate and Energy program, conducting analytical work on the Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon regulations. Prior to this position, Dr. Richardson was a Kendall Science Fellow and researched the fundamental cultural and economic drivers of coal production in West Virginia. He has a Ph.D. and M.S. in physics from the University of Colorado at Boulder as well as a B.S. in Physics from West Virginia University. Subscribe to Jeremy's posts

Subscribe to Jeremy's posts

Jeremy's Latest Posts

Real Help for Coal Miners Requires Real Solutions

Any day now, the president is expected to sign one or more executive orders aimed at rolling back environmental safeguards that improve our public health through protecting clean air and clean water. It will likely include the beginning of the new administration’s efforts to rescind the Clean Power Plan, the first ever limits on global warming emissions (or carbon emissions) from existing power plants. That’s in addition to signing a bill revoking the stream protection rule and an executive order reviewing the Waters of the United States rule.

Much of the rhetoric around these actions has been focused on supporting fossil fuels—and especially about bringing back lost coal jobs. But how realistic is this promise to the nation’s coal miners? Read more >

Photo: Ryan/CC BY (Flickr)
Bookmark and Share

3 Reasons Why Federal Energy R&D is a Wise Investment

Former Texas Governor Rick Perry will head into confirmation hearings in the next few days to become the next Secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE). A colleague of mine penned a great piece about what we might expect from Perry as head of the DOE. One key thing to highlight is that the DOE is responsible for investments in research and development (R&D), particularly related to energy. In an era where Congress is looking to trim federal spending, they should keep in mind that investments in energy R&D are a wise and proper use of limited federal government resources. Here’s why. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Congress Can and Should Act to Support Coal Communities

Congress returns from recess to a big opportunity to support coal communities, by passing the RECLAIM Act (H.R.4456), which would release existing funding for the cleanup and redevelopment of abandoned mine lands with the goal of spurring economic development in these communities. I previously blogged about this bill when it was introduced by Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY-5) back in February. This month, the House Natural Resources Committee will be considering a revised version of the bill, hopefully leading to a markup and a vote out of committee. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Pennsylvania Can Continue its Leadership Role on the Clean Power Plan

Last week the Supreme Court put a hold on the Clean Power Plan. Importantly, the legal stay does not prevent states from moving ahead with formulating compliance plans as the legal merits of the plan are argued. And the Wolf Administration is demonstrating leadership by pressing forward with plans to comply with the Clean Power Plan and continuing its robust engagement process with stakeholders. A new UCS analysis released today shows that well designed power sector policies—including a carbon trading program with auctioned allowances—would generate $804 million on average per year that could be invested in Pennsylvania’s economy to benefit all citizens. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Will Congress Act to Protect Coal Mining Communities?

Today marks the release of the President’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2017. Included in the request to Congress is a package of policies that would go a long way toward helping struggling coal communities in Appalachia. And there’s even potential for action in Congress—a bill to implement one important policy was introduced last week. Read more >

Bookmark and Share