Birds, Solar Power, and the Future of Renewable Energy in California

Bookmark and Share

It’s an exciting time for solar, as UCS recently communicated its new report, Solar Power on the Rise. But with any strong surge in an emerging industry, unintended consequences crop up that must be addressed.

The latest challenge for the large-scale concentrated solar power (CSP) industry that builds power towers, which use large mirrors to direct sunlight onto a boiler atop a tower to create steam, is the potential for insects and avian species to be singed by concentrated beams of light and heat, called “solar flux.” News outlets like NBC have recently reported on birds dying from solar flux at the Ivanpah facility, a 392 MW CSP power tower project, built by BrightSource Energy in California’s Mojave Desert.

Mirrors from Ivanpah concentrate light and heat onto a single boiler. Photo: Howard Ignatius

Mirrors from Ivanpah concentrate light and heat onto a single boiler. Photo: Howard Ignatius

It’s still not clear what is attracting the birds and bugs to Ivanpah, how to reroute them or otherwise reduce flux impacts, and whether these problems would occur at other proposed power tower projects. BrightSource and its partner, Abengoa Solar, would like to build two 240 MW power towers in Riverside County, California.

There’s no question that when you build a large power plant–coal, gas, renewable–the things already living there will likely be impacted. It’s an acute concern and cause of tension in the West, where desert ecosystems host sensitive plant and animal species and some of the best solar generation resources in the world.

California, aware that it’s on the world stage and others are watching how it manages the permitting process for large-scale renewables, is taking many proactive measures to figure out how to integrate environmental impact considerations into project selection and permitting processes. It’s not easy to do because impacts can be very site specific and some don’t become clear until project construction is underway or completed. But, after a couple of years building these projects, California is learning from its experiences.

In early August, the California Energy Commission (CEC) hosted a workshop to discuss the role that environmental scoring can have in the project section process. The CEC has also dispersed grant money to six counties in California — Imperial, Inyo, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Luis Obispo — to develop and improve ordinances and general plans to help move renewable energy projects along. And the agency continues to take the lead on the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation (DRECP) plan, a multi-stakeholder process that seeks to identify areas in the Mojave and Colorado deserts where renewable energy development is most appropriate.

In addition to following through on efforts like the DRECP, the solar industry should consider forming a more formal and ongoing relationship with individuals and organizations concerned about the environmental impact of large-scale developments. This would provide a way for people to establish consistent and productive lines of communication, and create a forum to have difficult conversations and incubate creative solutions. One model for this type of arrangement is the American Wind Wildlife Institute, which brings scientists, conservation groups, and developers together to document impacts and devise solutions to reduce the impacts of wind development, in order to foster a more sustainable and productive industry.

Despite the challenges we’ve faced, I am encouraged that the parties involved in licensing these projects seem committed to measuring and mitigating the impacts of renewable energy development on local ecosystems, while keeping in mind that it’s absolutely critical to transition away from fossil fueled electricity generation if the world is going to confront climate change and reduce the damage it will cause to our environment and economy. Many of the flora and fauna impacted by project development will also be significantly harmed by climate change. Given this, we must do everything we can to promote responsible and sustainable investments in new renewable energy resources in order to support a steady and focused transition away from fossil fuels, which we know is necessary.

Posted in: Energy Tags: , , ,

About the author: Laura Wisland is a senior energy analyst and an expert on California renewable energy policies. She holds a master’s degree in public policy. See Laura's full bio.

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

  • Richard Solomon

    Thanks for providing more context and info about this issue. I saw a report on NBC about it but time constraints meant they could not provide as much info as you have.

    The development of any power plant is going to affect the environment in some way. As most of the existing ones were built many years ago most of us do not know how these plants affected the animals and fauna where they were built. Also, people were not thinking about this issue in the way that we do nowadays. They just built the plants with little or no concern about environmental impacts, etc.

    We need to develop alternatives to fossil fuel power plants. So, it is good that steps are being taken to mitigate against the impact that these new plants will have.

  • Gail Turner

    What attracts birds and bugs to this area is that it is a natural path for migrating birds from Canada to Mexico every year. Besides this installation there is another Abengoa near Harper Dry Lake, also in the Mojave Desert. This installation is being built across a dirt road from a riparian habitat for the same migrating birds, which was built and maintained by BLM. I live near there and go many times a year to observe migratory birds and exercise my dogs. The installation is parabolic steam technology and the panels look like mirrors which resemble the nearby water and birds dive into the panels and kill themselves. Wish all could see the ruined habitat and the broken panels from diving birds. The temperature in the area rises up the nearer you get to the installation.
    The birds have had to adapt and fly elsewhere as I never see any migratory birds there anymore. A couple coots in the water. I see more Canadian geese and egrets at the man-made pond at the golf course near my home.

  • UCS Blog


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, obscene, rude or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. When commenting, you must use your real name. Valid email addresses are required. (UCS respects your privacy; we will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)