McConnell Gets It Wrong—Again—in Clean Power Plan Court Filing

, senior energy analyst, Clean Energy | February 24, 2016, 11:14 am EST
Bookmark and Share

In a legal brief filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and friends repeated some spurious cost claims about the Clean Power Plan from a debunked American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity/NERA Economic Consulting report. Now it’s time to set the record straight… again.

The spurious claims about the Clean Power Plan (CPP) come from the ACCCE/NERA report we debunked back in November based on their lack of transparency and their likely flawed inputs. And they’ve popped up in an important venue—an amicus brief (see pages 23-24) filed before the D.C. Court of Appeals by Leader McConnell and other members of Congress who oppose the CPP.

nera-accce-clean-power-plan-report-not-science

A previously debunked report is being used to support a legal challenge to the Clean Power Plan.

You have to do a bit of detective work to connect the dots, but it turns out that Leader McConnell and friends used a House report from November as the source of the CPP cost estimates they mention in the amicus brief. What they fail to mention, though, is that the cost estimates in the House report come from the misleading ACCCE/NERA study—and that the “dissenting views” section of the same House report debunks the ACCCE/NERA study based on several of the criteria I mentioned in November, namely:

The majority’s report also relies heavily on a recent NERA analysis that is flawed in a number of key aspects For one, it does not take into account any of the benefits of the Clean Power Plan. Also, as described more fully elsewhere, the NERA analysis ignores recent studies that show real world investments in energy efficiency programs generate net savings for consumers—efficiency shows up in the NERA study as a net cost—and the NERA analysis significantly overestimates the costs for renewables like wind and solar.

These Congressional leaders should know better than to trust such flawed sources. After all, the Washington Post Fact Checker has flagged similar cost claims by ACCCE as “misleading.”

And, evidently, ACCCE’s own members aren’t buying the disinformation the group is peddling. At least two dozen members have quit ACCCE since 2008, including fossil fuel and utility interests BHP Billiton, Consol Energy, Consumers Energy, Detroit Edison, Duke Energy, and First Energy. American Electric Power also slashed its funding for ACCCE from 2014 to 2015, and will hopefully join the utility exodus this year.

So it’s dismaying—and wrong—to see this study rear its head again. If Leader McConnell and colleagues are going to weigh in on something as important as the CPP, they’d do well to make sure they’ve got their facts straight first.

Posted in: Energy Tags:

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • solodoctor

    McConnell and his colleagues are not interested in the facts. They are interested in pushing the interests of their campaign contributors. Ie, the coal industry.

    KEEP UP your good work in trying to set the record straight!

    • ucsjrogers

      “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our
      inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the
      state of facts and evidence.” – President John Adams (http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/3235.html).

      Good thing so many of us are interested in the facts. Thanks for the support, solo.

      – John

  • petethebear51

    Once again, the fossil-fuel industry has taken to nudging the American Neanderthal Party (nee:GOP – “Cheerfully dragging our knuckles on ecological, civil and basic women’s rights for decades.”) into an effort to throw this nation backwards into the 1950’s. Pathetic, simply pathetic !

    • ucsjrogers

      I think it’s up to us to be on the watch for disinformation wherever it can be found, Pete, and no party has a monopoly on it. But you’re right about the fossil fuel industry’s undue influence. The good news is that there are plenty of signs that we’re winning the fight to bring climate and energy science into the forefront. Let’s do more. Thanks for weighing in. – John