Going Beyond Investigative Bench Science to Support Community Nutrition

Megan Meyer, Ph.D. Candidate
, ,
UCS | October 27, 2014, 4:50 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

In 2013, nearly 15% of US households, or in 17.5 million Americans, were food-insecure. According to the USDA, food-insecure households are defined as those that “have difficulty providing enough food for all family members due to lack of resources.” With this large domestic problem, many communities have developed programs to alleviate food insecurity.

Nearly five years ago, I started volunteering at The Interfaith Council (IFC) food pantry as a Client Interviewer. As a Client Interviewer, I directly interact with the IFC clients to determine their individual needs and provide them with food items from the IFC food pantry. However, the IFC food pantry is unlike any food pantry I have seen or heard about since the IFC has a unique collaboration established with local farmers. This collaboration collects surplus produce from the weekly farmers’ market and distributes the produce to the IFC clients. Working with the IFC has granted me the opportunity to see, first-hand, the impact of food insecurity in the local community, work on projects to decrease food insecurity, and suggest strategies to alleviate this pervasive problem.

5 percent of Americans are having trouble putting food on the table.  Credit: Tiffany Farrant https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4127550851/in/set-72157622404508149

5 percent of Americans are having trouble putting food on the table. Photo: Tiffany Farrant

Increasing the number of organizations that promote community nutrition can reduce food insecurity

Organizations such as Farmer Foodshare and Community Nutrition Partnership are excellent examples for community-based programs that support local agriculture and improve nutrition rates in food-insecure individuals in the Research Triangle Park region of North Carolina. Farmer Foodshare strives to provide fresh produce to the local community and to boost farm economics. Since 2009, Farmer Foodshare has raised over 100 tons of fresh, local food for non-profit organizations to improve food security in numerous counties across North Carolina.

Connecting farmer’s markets with organizations that promote food security not only provides fresh produce to the food-insecure individuals but also supports local farming, minimizes waste, improves public health outcomes, and builds mutually beneficial relationships in the community. Though these programs are based in North Carolina, there are many other organizations throughout the United States with similar missions of supporting local agriculture and addressing food insecurity.

How scientists and experts can contribute to improve nutrition in local communities

Many of the IFC clients that I have interacted with are excited about the access to fresh, healthy produce. However, despite their excitement, few are fully aware of the health impact these products may afford them and their families. To me, this signifies a powerful opportunity for education to increase awareness and understanding about the health benefits of fresh produce. Infographics, that are interactive and concise, could be utilized to impart key nutrition facts and health impact of the goods. Furthermore, cooking recommendations or demonstrations would ensure that the clients understand how to properly store and use the food items.

While providing food may greatly improve the nutrition and health of their clients, evidence-based, objective information is lacking to support these claims. If organizations were able to collaborate with local scientists to formulate and test hypotheses about their programs’ interventions, empirical data could be generated to analyze the efficacy and effect of their program on defined health outcomes. These results could identify programs that are working and could be used as compelling evidence for extramural grants and support.

Basic research can answer specific and detailed questions

Did you know that an antioxidant found in broccoli sprouts reduces inflammation and lowers markers of influenza infection? I’m currently investigating the effects of environmental oxidants such as cigarette smoke and nutritional antioxidants on the respiratory immune response to influenza or “flu” virus. With our pre-clinical human research, we have shown that sulforaphane, an antioxidant found in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower, reduces influenza-induced inflammation as well as influenza replication in smokers. These exciting results suggest that nutritional supplementation may be a safe and inexpensive strategy for reducing influenza risk among high-risk populations such as smokers.

My laboratory research experience has afforded me the ability to examine the intersection between nutrition and immunology and how this intersection impacts human health. This type of scientific investigation offers an opportunity for scientists to connect and apply their work to support public health outcomes. Food insecurity remains a domestic and international problem, and promoting the collaboration of farmers, food banks, and scientists could generate possible policies and plans to solve this pervasive issue.

Posted in: Food and Agriculture Tags: , , , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Wow! Strong comments from C. Bradley. I think that getting people off cheap, fast foods and onto something that is more nutritionally dense is the point! Yes, greens are not a cure all, but they are better than fast food and pre packaged crap!

    • Jen

      Whoa — cabbage is “nutritionally dense”? There’s another of those squishy weasel words! There definitely is some serious “density” among zealot windbreakers around here. This must be why we are unable to make lasting progress in the good food movement. So many fluffy dreamers, so many maniacal screamers, so few reasoning thinkers. Sure, “greens” have a place but so do “cheap fast food” and “packaged crap”. A diet exclusively of pricey home cooked greens and cruciferous veggies is hardly a cure-all for what ails the common folk. That’s what downtrodden peasants in old Russia survived on until they finally rebelled against it. Since then and until very recently they’ve enjoyed the occasional Big Mac along with their cabbage soup, and are the healthier and happier for it.

  • C. Bradley, PhD

    “While providing food may greatly improve the nutrition and health of their clients, evidence-based, objective information is lacking to support these claims”
    That is simply because the many notional “claims” you and your pals would prefer to make for miraculous disease-conquering powers of veggies lie far, far outside any scientifically valid affirmation of same.
    Sure, if you could force some poor nicotine-addicted schmuck to eat enough broccoli and cabbage everyday there may be some small moderation in severity of any influenza she might experience. That’s MAY BE. For a SMOKER. Only IF she eats vast amounts of cruciferous vegetables. And risk of influenza would be the very least of her worries, under the circumstances.
    Your example is inconsequential when held up against the entire population but, still, you and your collegial zealots would certainly hype this into a frantic insistence all of us must be enticed, tricked or forced into eating loads of these gassy bitter plant foods…to make us bulletproof against influenza and maybe all lung disorders and surely all diseases, thus assuring ultimate “healthiness” (or some other such pop culture nonsense buzzword).
    You would do well to sit a few good courses in epidemiology during your PhD studies. Get some perspective. Also a good course in medical ethics might ground you in practicality. Otherwise you are in for a rude awakening when reality slaps some sense into you out here in the real world. Good luck.