Minnesota Scientists, Engineers, Economists, and Health Professionals Support Clean Energy

Dr. Lee Frelich
, ,
UCS | January 29, 2015, 10:22 am EDT
Bookmark and Share

Minnesota has an important opportunity this year to continue its leadership on clean energy.  I, along with 54 other Minnesota scientists, engineers, economists, and health professionals, support requiring 40 percent of the state’s electricity to come from renewable energy resources, such as wind and solar, by the year 2030.

Renewable energy is already working for Minnesota.  Our current renewable energy standard (RES) of 25 percent by 2025 has created jobs, provided affordable electricity for families and businesses, and reduced pollution to our lakes, rivers, and streams. Renewable energy powers hundreds of thousands of homes in Minnesota and we have only begun to realize our renewable energy potential. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Minnesota could generate more than 20 times its 2013 electricity demand with wind energy.

Minnesota Nice

However, Minnesota still relies heavily on dirty fossil fuels to meet most of its electricity demand. Ramping up renewables and moving away from expensive fossil fuels is one of the best steps Minnesota can take to improve public health, boost local economies, and help protect communities from the consequences of climate change. Increasing the proportion of renewable energy is the most effective way to help the regional economy, protect the environment, and improve our quality of life.

Wind Farm in Tracy, MN. Photo credit: Mark Kaletka, Flickr.

Wind Farm in Tracy, MN. Photo credit: Mark Kaletka, Flickr.

Wind and solar costs have declined dramatically in recent years, making these zero-carbon technologies competitive with coal and natural gas power without exposure to volatile fossil fuel prices. Renewable energy saves Minnesota money in the long-term and we need a responsible plan that maximizes cost savings for rate payers. Our existing RES has been achieved at little to no cost to consumers. Due to declining wind and solar costs, technology advances, and Minnesota’s wealth of available renewable energy resources, we can now significantly increase our use of renewable energy while maintaining the reliability of our electricity system and keeping utility bills affordable.

As an ecologist, I understand the great risk that an overreliance on fossil fuels poses to our environment and our health. Minnesota’s commitment to renewable energy has contributed to the reduction of harmful pollutants that lead to health ailments.  Reducing our use of fossil fuels that emit these pollutants and transitioning to a clean energy economy will help Minnesota ensure a healthy legacy for our children and future generations.

Minnesota has vast clean energy potential that can be developed affordably with proven technologies. Increasing our use of renewable energy to at least 40 percent by 2030 will further protect our health, cut carbon dioxide pollution to prevent the worst effects of climate change, and reinvigorate Minnesota’s clean energy economy. By generating more of our electricity from renewable energy sources, we can continue to protect all that makes Minnesota a special place to live.

Sign the letter by clicking here: www.ucsusa.org/minnesotaletter  

Posted in: Energy Tags: , , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Eagle Siting

    The MN Transmission feasibility study says that 40% renewables in MN requires running most of the coal plants at current levels. Without the coal plants must run base load, this is not feasible. Once upon a time “scientists” were interested in real science and “environmentalists” were interested in improving the environment – but that was long ago. https://mn.gov/commerce/energy/images/final-mrits-report-2014.pdf

  • Eagle Siting

    Google Engineers confirmed that you can’t make any significant reduction in CO2 using current renewable technology – wind and solar. Try something that might work. http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/renewables/what-it-would-really-take-to-reverse-climate-change

  • This is a good approuch to our environmental problems with clean green renewables as a hole. Now we know that both wind & solar only work some time! Now a big WHAT IF question is ” how could we combine both solar & wind in 1 structure that combined other thermal heat to make a on demand power plant that is just that. Oh by the way it can be community owned 5 sizes for a better fit & cost less than 1 wind tower or large community size solar feild. AS the renewable energy researcher inventor of this systems & its name is ” Renewable Thermal Wind Power the energy resource. To see the planed system there is a public education site http://www.renewablethermalwindpower.com This systems explaination is from shared technologies, Structure’s internal make up & placement of each is open to all whom really want a clean environment & low cost renewable energy as for more explaination to your community’s ecconmic development meetings for more than 30 people I will speak to all whom want to take part anywhere needed.

  • Andrew H Mackay

    It will not work! Wind turbines should be used to generate heat for storage in large underground thermal accumulators. None of this electricity should go anywhere near the utility grid. Electricity for the grid can them be generated thermally to meet demand. ie load following electricity 24-7-52.