A new UCS report released today shows how clean energy financing programs offer a promising avenue for scaling up investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency that can reap significant economic and consumer benefits, while helping states achieve EPA’s Clean Power Plan carbon emission reduction targets.
The report highlights six state-level programs (Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Iowa and Massachusetts) and one international program (Germany) that have successfully leveraged private-sector funding to strengthen clean energy investment. These programs range from all-encompassing “green banks” to more discrete efforts focused on a particular clean energy market sector.
State green banks are institutions that provide financial products to assist homes, businesses, and institutions with developing clean energy by leveraging low cost, private-sector capital. Financing costs for these programs are typically lower because the state backing lowers their risk. States have been innovating in this way because of challenges to implementing traditional financing programs. For example, direct incentives programs such as grants and rebates, while effective, can sometimes be difficult to scale up because of cost concerns and administrative complexities. The private sector also has a strong interest in getting in on the economic opportunity afforded by clean energy investments.
More capital needed for clean energy
While investments in renewables and efficiency have rapidly increased over the past decade, further increases will be required to meet the growth in energy demand and to limit the worst consequences of climate change. For example, a 2012 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) study estimated that reaching targets of 30 percent of U.S. electricity generated from renewable energy by 2025 and 80 percent by 2050 will require investment on the scale of $50-$70 billion annually over the next decade.
A key tool in the toolbox
To spur investments in renewables and efficiency, states can adopt a number of proven clean energy market-development mechanisms. The most popular to date have included renewable electricity standards, energy efficiency resource standards, public benefits funds, tax and incentive policies, utility rebates, building-energy codes, net metering, and carbon cap-and-trade programs.
The states highlighted in this report have also used green banks and other financing initiatives to help secure funding for clean energy investments without the need for substantial direct incentives from state coffers. These initiatives complement existing policies, and can also help make renewables and efficiency more competitive, especially as existing policies change, expire, or become less effective. With the costs of renewable energy falling dramatically in recent years, this is also an attractive opportunity for private sector investors looking to participate in the rapidly growing clean energy economy.
These financing programs have also been effective at addressing key market barriers such as high upfront costs, the relative small scale of projects, financiers’ limited understanding of the technology and performance risks, and limited customer access to low cost capital.
An impressive track record
While some programs have a lengthy history of success, others are in their early proof-of-concept stages. Regardless, all seven programs have made impressive progress:
- Connecticut’s Green Bank has completed 8,800 projects and installed solar panels in more than 10,000 Connecticut homes over the past three years, creating 6,200 jobs and reducing carbon emissions by one million tons. The state’s Smart E-Loan and Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) programs have leveraged private sector capital at a ratio of 10:1.
- New York’s Green Bank announced its first round of clean energy investments in October 2014, totaling $800 million, which are expected to leverage private sector capital at a ratio of 8:1 and yield returns of 1.5 to 4.1 percent.
- Pennsylvania’s Keystone Home Energy Loan Program (HELP) has supported more than 12,000 residential loans totaling nearly $90 million, with a low loan default rate of 1.3 percent.
- Kentucky’s Home Performance Program has invested $11 million in 1,000 energy efficiency retrofits of single-family homes, achieving average energy bill savings of 26 percent and training some 150 contractors to perform retrofits.
- Iowa’s Alternative Energy Revolving Loan Program has provided $28.6 million in funding for 195 renewable energy projects with total construction costs of $295 million since 1996. The Iowa Green Bank currently offers $50,000 to $500,000 in the form of 1-percent interest loans for up to 10 years.
- Massachusetts’ Mass Save HEAT Loan program financed $180 million in residential energy efficiency projects in more than 21,000 homes between 2006 and 2012. The program provides homeowners and landlords with no-interest loans of up to $25,000 for seven years for a wide range of efficiency and renewable energy technologies.
- Germany’s Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) Green Bank financed $115 billion in renewables and efficiency projects in more than one million homes between 2011 and 2013, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and significantly reducing carbon emissions.
As the above programs show, states can use these programs and other existing policies to demonstrate commitments to renewables and efficiency—with quantifiable costs, fossil fuel savings, and carbon emissions reductions-—that can be used to meet EPA’s criteria for complying with the Clean Power Plan. Renewable energy and energy efficiency are two “building blocks” identified by EPA to quantify each state’s emission reduction targets and to demonstrate compliance. States are free to combine any of these building blocks in a flexible manner to meet their targets.
What other states should keep in mind
State clean energy financing programs have been able to successfully engage diverse stakeholders to help mobilize capital. Collaborative efforts have included:
- making use of existing contractor networks to help roll out financing programs
- consulting with the financial community to build trust and identify sustainable funding sources
- drawing on local utilities’ experience delivering programs to avoid duplication.
State agencies have also learned important lessons for administering these programs. This includes using in-house energy expertise to reduce the financial risks of private-sector loans that have enabled a broad array of individuals, businesses, and institutions to achieve savings from clean energy projects.
These seven case studies clearly demonstrate that clean energy financing programs offer a cost-effective approach to help states achieve their Clean Power Plan emissions-reduction targets, while lowering consumer energy bills and generating local economic benefits. By leveraging private-sector capital and reducing the need for taxpayer or ratepayer dollars, these programs have also helped attract bipartisan support.
Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.