federal advisory committee


Science Advice in Action: Highlights from an EPA Science Advisory Board Meeting

, science and policy analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

We have been writing a lot lately about the importance of federal science advice and defending the value of advisory committees like the EPA’s Board of Scientific Counselors and EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) against threats of budget cuts and reform. When I saw that the full SAB would be meeting at the end of August, I jumped at the opportunity to attend. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Going in the Wrong Direction: We Need More Advice on the Impacts of Climate Change

, director, Center for Science & Democracy

As of Sunday, the federal Advisory Panel for the Sustained National Climate Assessment is no more.  The charter for the panel was not renewed. That makes little sense from any perspective I can imagine. This panel was advising the federal government on how to best improve the scientific information for state and local governments, businesses and the public on the ongoing impacts of climate change.

Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Advisory Committee Shakeup Targets Independent Science and Scientists

, science and policy analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

There is a full-on assault afoot to strip away the independence of science advisory committees at several government agencies. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

How’s EPA’s Science Advice Process Doing? Celebrating Sunshine and Progress at the EPA

, science and policy analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

Happy sunshine week! It’s a week to celebrate one of the pillars of our democracy: access to information. This year’s sunshine week seems especially important because of the current Administration’s open hostility toward the media, which has been shining a light on the federal government’s operations day in and day out and illustrating the clear conflicts of interest of the corporate cabinet. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Advancing Scientific Integrity Through Federal Advisory Committees

, science and policy analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

Back in October, I provided a comment at a public meeting for a National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) advisory committee that was set up to review the process to update the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Their first charge was to write a report with recommendations on how the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) selection process could be improved to provide more transparency, minimize bias, and include committee members with a range of viewpoints. Read more >

Bookmark and Share