Transparency


The Public Interest Lies in Promoting Transparency AND Protecting Scientists from Harassment

, program manager, Center for Science & Democracy

On Sunday, the New York Times published an op-ed from Paul Thacker, a former Senate staffer who is critical of UCS’s efforts to protect scientists from harassment. Unfortunately, he misrepresents our work, as he did previously in a PLOS Biology op-ed that was ultimately retracted (to our surprise, while we were corresponding with an editor about corrections to the piece). Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Are Oil Companies Ready for the Next Katrina?

, lead analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

Ten years ago this week, a hurricane was gaining strength in the North Atlantic.  Meteorologists worked around the clock to understand and predict its future path and strength. That path and strength, it turns out, would make the record books. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Transparency is Great, Harassment is Worth Preventing: A Response to Paul Thacker and Charles Seife

, science communication officer

*See 8/24/15 update*

Transparency is in everyone’s interest. Harassing scientists is not. So where should we draw the line when politicians use their investigatory powers to target scientists or when corporations and ideological interest groups use open records requests to harass researchers at public institutions? Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Communicating Science: Barriers Journalists Face at Government Agencies

, democracy analyst, Center for Science & Democracy

Transparency invigorates a strong democracy. It inspires trust and spurs citizens to hold their leaders accountable. As citizens, we have the right to know about the scientific information shaping the policies that affect our health, our safety, and the environment, and our government has a responsibility to share this information openly. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

4 Ways “Fast Track” Is a Bad Deal for Science

, sr. Washington rep., Center for Science & Democracy

Soon, members of the House of Representatives will cast a vote that could affect every American family for years to come. The vote is on Trade Promotion Authority, or fast-track, legislation that would give not only the current President but also a future president the power to negotiate complicated trade deals and then submit them to Congress for an up-or-down vote. The Senate approved fast-track in late May, after a spirited debate that raised many concerns about the wisdom of this approach. Read more >

Bookmark and Share