Join
Search

Which Costs More? Transmission Lines for 10x More Renewable Energy, or Pipelines for 2x More Natural Gas

Bookmark and Share

Two recent reports make clear that long-distance gas pipeline infrastructure will cost more than the transmission investment needed for achieving 80% renewable electricity. The Keystone XL pipeline is just one new pipeline – let’s think about the energy system we are building.

The future as seen by gas industry. credit: INGAA

The future as seen by gas industry.
credit: INGAA

Gas industry groups America’s Natural Gas Alliance and the INGAA Foundation reported on March 18 that the gas industry sees need for pipeline investments of $641 billion over next 20 years in the U.S. and Canada. The cost of new natural gas transmission capacity could be approximately $14 billion per year (real 2012$).

On one hand, while some of the pipeline investment would serve oil needs, when electricity planners think big, they are also including increased electricity use for transportation as well. (Think electric cars.) The NREL Renewable Energy Futures study of 80% electricity from renewable energy, (with 80% annual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions) projected annual investments in new transmission infrastructure, including interconnections for all plants, was less than the gas industry costs, ranging between $6.4 and $8.4 billion/year from 2011 through 2050.

Now that the gas industry sees $641 billion to bring hydro-fractured gas to use as power plant fuel, we can compare other studies with lower transmission costs for great amounts of added wind and solar.

Other Studies

Electric supply with 80% renewables. credit: NREL

Electric supply with 80% renewables. credit: NREL

  • Utilities’ Eastern-wide (39 states, 70% of US population) EIPC study
    Transmission costs: $100 billion
    CO2 reductions: 80% in electricity sector by 2050
  • PJM (13 states, 61 million people) 30% Renewables study by 2026
    Transmission costs: $13.7 billion
    CO2 reductions: up to 40%
  • EEI (U.S. investor-owned electric utilities) report of 10 years planned transmission
    Transmission costs: $60.6 billion
    Transmission supportingrenewables: $46.1 billion

With these descriptions of our energy choices, we can make real choices. We should choose renewables first.

Posted in: Energy, Fossil Fuels, Global Warming

About the author: Michael Jacobs is a senior energy analyst with expertise in electricity markets, transmission and renewables integration work. See Mike's full bio.

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

  • http://Facebook. William Body

    There is only one answer, new transmission lines for renewables,SOLAR,WIND and the others. Lets move NOW.

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, obscene, rude or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. When commenting, you must use your real name. Valid email addresses are required. (UCS respects your privacy; we will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)