How do EVs Compare with Gas-Powered Vehicles? Better Every Year….

, research and deputy director, Clean Vehicles | September 16, 2014, 11:59 am EDT
Bookmark and Share

UPDATE February 2020: Driving the average EV is responsible for fewer global warming emissions than the average new gasoline car everywhere in the US. Read our latest analysis, “Are Electric Vehicles Really Better for the Climate? Yes. Here’s Why.”

As we embark on the 4th annual National Drive Electric Week, U.S. electric vehicle (EV) sales are approaching a quarter million, and 20 plug-in models are now available in at least some parts of the country. This represents a major advancement from the first introduction of the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf plug-in electric vehicles in model year 2011. It’s not just the number of models and sales numbers that have changed in the last four years. We’ve also seen the average energy efficiency of EVs improving. Just as making gasoline vehicles more efficient reduces fuel consumption and lowers emissions, making EVs that consume less electricity for every mile they drive is lowering the carbon footprint of driving on electricity. Based on improvements in EV efficiency and more recent electricity emissions data, 60 percent of American’s now live in regions where an EV produces fewer global warming emissions than even the most efficient gasoline-hybrid vehicle.

Upgrades and new models improve EV efficiency

Some plug-in electric models have undergone improvements to improve their efficiency. The Nissan Leaf, for example, was upgraded in model year 2013 with improved regenerative braking, aerodynamics, and a more efficient heater to boost the previous efficiency rating of .34 kWh/mile (a measure of how much electricity is consumed for traveling 1 mile) to the current model years rating of .30 kWh/mile – a 12% improvement (a lower kWh/mile rating = more efficient).


The Nissan LEAF efficiency rating improved by 12 percent between model year 2011 and model year 2013, lowering the amount of electricity needed per mile of driving. Photo courtesy of Nissan.

To put that in perspective, the amount of electricity you use to power your toaster oven for about 20 minutes can move a 3,000 pound electric car more than a mile. A flurry of new BEV (battery electric) models have also been introduced since 2011, including the Honda Fit, Chevy Spark, Ford Focus EV, Toyota RAV4 EV, Tesla Model S, the Smart ED, Chevy Spark EV, and most recently the BMW i3.


This post is part of a series on National Drive Electric Week.

These vehicles span a range of efficiency. Some of the larger and longer range EVs, like the Model S sedan and RAV 4 EV SUV, consume more energy than their smaller counterparts, similar to how larger gasoline vehicles typically have lower fuel efficiency than smaller cars. For example, the two variants of the Tesla Model S are rated at .35 kWh/mile and .38 kWh/mile, with the longer range, higher-powered version consuming more electrons per mile. In comparison, the RAV 4 EV, a compact SUV, is rated at .44 kWh/mile. But other models, like the Fiat 500e and the BMW i3, exceed even the Leaf in efficiency. The BMW i3 is currently the most efficient vehicle on the road – achieving an EPA rating of .27kWh/mile. This is in large part due to the weight savings of the carbon fiber structure unique to the i3 and from designing the model from the ground up as an EV.

Improving EV efficiency lowers the global warming emissions from EVs

In our 2012 State of Charge analysis, we estimated the global warming emissions of operating an EV in different parts of the country. That analysis was based on the efficiency of the average BEV sold in 2011, equivalent to the model year 2011 Nissan Leaf (.34 kWh/mile). With new EV models and upgrades to older ones, the current average efficiency of new BEV’s is .325 kWh/mile (based on sales from July 2013 to June 2014) – representing about a 5% improvement since 2011. The combination of vehicle efficiency improvements and more recent power electricity emissions data directly translate to lower global warming emissions from driving an EV. Below is a map of the updated regional estimates for global warming emissions for the 26 electricity grid regions across the US. Compared to our previous analysis, nearly every region of the country has improved emissions for EVs. The improvements were enough to put the Texas, Florida and Southwest region into our “Best” category – where EV emissions are lower than a 50 mile per gallon gasoline-powered vehicle, and moved the northern plains states to the “Better” category.

How clean are EVs? Depends on where you live.

60 percent of Americans now live in areas where driving an EV has lower global warming emissions than even the best hybrid, up from our estimate of 45% just 3 years ago.

And consistent with our initial study findings, no matter where you live in the U.S., an EV has lower global warming emissions than the average new compact car, which gets approximately 28 miles per gallon. Emission from EVs are poised for even further reductions, as national electricity data from 2011 and 2012 show a declining percentage of coal power while renewables like wind and solar are increasing. This more recent data is not yet reflected in EPA’s eGRID power plant database or reflected in the map above. With increasing renewable electricity coming onto the grid, carbon standards for power plants under development, and continued improvement in vehicle technologies, the benefits of EVs will continue to grow.


For comparison: previous estimates using 2009 power plant data and average battery electric EV efficiency for model year 2011.

Notes on calculations: The updated analysis is based on the original State of Charge report methodology including the following updates: 1) Power plant emissions data for calendar year 2010 – eGRID2010 data. Nationally, the average global warming emissions intensity (grams of CO2 equivalent per kWh of electricity delivered) for power produced in the US increased slightly between 2009 and 2010 by about 1%. Variations in regional emissions are larger due mainly to variations in nuclear and hydro electricity production compared to 2009. National net generation data from EIA indicates that the fraction of coal-fired power to overall generation was reduced during subsequent years (2011 and 2012), meaning emissions intensity has improved, but regional data developed through eGrid is not available for those years. 2) GREET 1 2013 for global warming emissions of petroleum as well as estimates for upstream electricity emissions. 3) Average EV efficiency of 32.5 kWh/mile based on sales of battery electric vehicles between July 2013 and June 2014. 4) Population estimates are based on 2010 census data.

Posted in: Global Warming, Uncategorized, Vehicles Tags: , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Lee

    IN the notes on calculations section, i think the article means to say “0.325 kWh/mile”

  • DrGeneNelson

    Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), which has focused on non-carbon based electric power generation, such as using nuclear and renewables provided a link to this UCS article here:
    Quoting from the PG&E article, “In 2012, PG&E’s rate of CO2 emissions was only about a third of the national average for utilities. The utility isn’t resting on its laurels; this year it’s on track to supply about 27 percent of its electricity sales from renewable sources, up from less than 20 percent in 2012.”

  • Tom

    I converted a Suzuki Swift to electric in 2009. It uses about 0.190kWh/mile, and it’s price to range ratio is about 267. It also is more resource efficient to convert existing cars to electric than to build new ones. Top speed around 100 mph, 75 mile range, 0 to 60 mph in 16 seconds, regenerative braking. A 5.6kW roof top PV array supplies all power for the car and house plus an extra 6kWh per day average. My car uses LiFePO4 cells. The range would be more than doubled using the cells Tesla uses. The car manufacturers could do much better. And yes, we need a middle class like we had in the 50’s and 60’s.

  • Mike Salisbury

    I understand the methodology but do have concerns when your results
    indicate that moving from Denver (with 56% coal, 22% NG and 22%
    renewables) to Lexington, KY (with 96% coal!) would IMPROVE your GHG
    emissions by 35%.

    • danairUCS

      Thanks Mike. These results definitely need to be kept in perspective. They represent the average emissions in a grid region. States within those regions may deliver cleaner or dirtier power to their residents and in fact, results can vary by individual utility as well. Ideally, utility specific data would be uniformly available to individuals to understand the emissions associated with a kWh of electricity use.

      I’d also note that individuals may have options for choosing cleaner power. Many early EV adopters are generating their own electricity with rooftop solar and some utilities offer opt-in cleaner power programs.

  • js121

    We need a middle class that can afford both the cars & the fuel supply. For us, ex-middle class, the new compacts are the only choice financially and that’s not what we want.

    • Mark Renburke

      The lack of affordability of electrics is largely a myth. With the federal tax credit (which requires the buyer only around $50k of taxable income to take full credit) a LEAF, Volt, or a half dozen other BEVs and PHEVs have an average 5 year TCO (total cost of ownership) thousands less than all the “new compacts”, including Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, and Toyota Corollla. There are also lease deals such as $199 a month for a LEAF or $269 for a Volt. And additional state incentives such as the MA $2500 rebate program (all residents eligible for purchases or 3 year leases) and then there are used LEAFs and Volts coming off low mileage leases, many in the $15-19k range, and no gas only car has a lower operating cost than these. Do the research, crunch the numbers to your situation – you might be shocked how utterly low cost it is to drive electric.

  • Rick

    Question please: since this comparison starts with the electricity generated from the power plant to the EV, does the comparison also include the pollution from the refinery to the gasoline powered car?

    Can you tell me how much electricity (energy?) is needed to refine a gallon of gas, or indicate how much pollution is produced when refining a gallon of gas?

    • danairUCS

      Rick – We do include the emissions from extraction and refining of oil in our estimates.

      The upstream global warming emissions (extraction, refining, transport) are roughly 25% greater than the tailpipe emissions, or 5 lbs of CO2eq/gallon.

      • Rik

        Clarification: Extraction, refining, transport, etc. add up to about 25% of tailpipe emissions.

    • Eric

      It is believed that the refining of 1 gallon of gasoline takes about 4 to 7 KiloWatt-Hours of electricity. Considering a Nissan Leaf has a 24 KWH battery pack. 7KWH is about 1/4 the entire battery pack. And that 7kwh could have been used at 90+% efficiency out of the Leaf battery pack, and could propel the car about 23 miles of range. Instead that 7Kwh is burned as gasoline in a 30% efficient engine were 70% is lost as heat, and you might get lucky enough to get 23 miles out of that 1 gallon in a new car. But the 7kwh electricity would have cost just 70cents to put in the battery at 10cent a kwh. But your probably paying $3.60 to $4.00 for that gas and wasted the CO2 to get it !

      • Rik

        Oil refinery engineer here…

        Oil refining uses on average less than 0.2 kWh of electricity per gallon. The often mentioned numbers in the range of 4 to 7 kWh per gallon are the total energy used in refining. Less than 5% of this energy is from electricity. The other 95%+ is thermal energy produced by a combination of burning byproducts of oil refining processes and burning natural gas.

        If you look at an oil refinery you can see a lot of heater stacks. Those vent the exhaust from a lot of furnaces, where the thermal energy is produced.

  • Wow, I had no idea that the BMW i3 was the most efficient of the bunch. I feel like it doesn’t get nearly the media buzz that, for instance, the LEAF gets.