Photo: Pete Markham/Flickr

With the Public Distracted, Interior Department Moves Full Speed Ahead on Oil and Gas Leases

, Climate scientist | March 20, 2020, 1:26 pm EST
Bookmark and Share

This post is a part of a series on COVID-19 and the Coronavirus Pandemic

We are currently in a state of national emergency thanks in no small part to the Trump administration’s muzzling of public health experts and slow response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As we all do our part to limit the extent of this outbreak, the Department of the Interior (DOI) instead appears to be more focused on advancing oil and gas interests and abusing the situation to avoid public scrutiny and input on its actions.

Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt has kept a relatively low profile during this time, save for an announcement on Thursday that he is authorizing free entry into all national parks. What has garnered less attention is that the DOI is using the crisis as an excuse to sideline science, shut down advisory committees (even though in many cases they could meet virtually), and sell off oil and gas leases at discount prices without sufficient environmental review.

Heck of a job Katie

Secretary Bernhardt is attempting to tackle this unprecedented event by dusting off an old DOI Bush administration-era pandemic flu plan and putting his second-in-command in charge of overseeing the safety of the roughly 70,000 people employed by the Department of the Interior. 

So who’s safe hands has Secretary Bernhardt assigned this issue to? That would be former fossil fuel lobbyist turned Interior Deputy Secretary Katharine MacGregor, the newly confirmed deputy secretary who has been recently implicated in DOI policy changes that ignore worker safety and expert advice, and is also accused of working to remove safeguards related to public health and the environment.

So perhaps it is no surprise that earlier this week, in the midst of the pandemic, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management sold just under 14,600  oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico for the bargain price of $100 million over the protestations of environmental groups.

What Interior should be doing now

So what actions should Secretary Bernhardt and his staff be doing now in this time of national crisis? Here are just a few of the things we should expect if they were truly interested in protecting public lands, public input, and the public interest:

  • Delay new policy proposals until it is safe for the public to participate in public meetings and provide input and temporarily suspend currently planned public comment periods and rulemakings.
  • Stop oil and gas lease sales. The federal government has already lost billions of dollars to oil and gas over the last decade. Selling our leases at “current market” (read: discounted) rates doesn’t make any sense right now, nor does moving ahead with lease sales that require public comment and input in the midst of an all-consuming crisis.
  • Don’t bail out oil and gas. President Trump has already floated the idea that financial packages for oil and gas could be included in federal economic stimulus bills responding to the crisis. But the extremely low price-per-barrel we’re experiencing right now is more due to the fight between Saudi Arabia and Russia flooding the market with supply and less about the demand-side reduction. Further, the proposed packages aren’t designed to assist the oil and gas industry workers hit hardest by the economic fallout of the coronavirus. As such, this bailout cannot be allowed to happen and certainly should not be linked to the coronavirus crisis.
  • Close the national parks. I know this might be a controversial suggestion, but hear me out on this. Secretary Bernhardt just temporarily abolished entrance fees that could potentially encourage more visitors. Many park managers have already chosen to close their parks and/or key visitor facilities, but those that remain open will face an influx of visitors all attempting to socially distance themselves in the great outdoors, potentially without knowledge of the latest park conditions (because the visitor centers are closed). Along with potentially increased traffic in parks and inevitable social interactions on popular trails, also add the park rangers who will be directly dealing with park visitors and putting themselves needlessly at risk. We need to close the parks for the safety of the staff and the public.

The coming weeks are going to be difficult as the full reality of social isolation set in. Many of us are anxious about what COVID-19 will mean for the safety of our family, our society, and ability to recover economically. Unfortunately, we now have to add to this burden that we cannot rely on some of our government officials entrusted to protect our public lands and interests.

We need to stay strong throughout this and continue to pay attention to what all parts of our government are doing. Just because we are socially distancing doesn’t mean we can’t stand vigilant to watchdog and call out egregious agency actions when we see them. Indeed, we need to do so now more than ever.

Photo: Pete Markham/Flickr

Posted in: Science and Democracy Tags: , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Zara

    NPS scientific experts may be left completely. Olamide songs

  • Now political appointees in the Interior Department have become the gatekeepers to Park Service participation in the environmental review process. Even more disturbing, this new process also makes it more likely that NPS staff will no longer be notified, or given any reasons why, if their comments are not submitted as part of a review. NPS scientific experts may be left completely. Nasty C

  • detomater

    They’re trying to get them at taxpayer-subsidized prices too….
    Lawmakers urge Interior Department to provide royalty relief

  • Kristin

    Sounds like you have an ax to grind and you are using this platform to share it. I find your article unappealing after reading the first paragraph which was the last paragraph I read. I won’t waste my time reading ill composed and ill will towards OUR president. I thought opinions were left to opinion papers and not news articles, which I mistakenly thought that’s what I was about to read. Why don’t you leave the USA and go to somewhere like Mexico or other counties if you are unhappy here!!

    • detomater

      If you don’t like the First Amendment, why don’t you go to Russia or China, you’ll be a lot happier somewhere only government propaganda is allowed?

  • Jack

    Why don’t you do the right thing and change your name to Union of Politically Biased Concerned Scientists. Having a viewpoint is not wrong, trying to hide it or refusing to admit it is dishonest at a minimum.