Connecting the Dots: Drought, Climate Change, and Groundwater Regulation

, , director, California & Western States | September 16, 2014, 1:25 pm EST
Bookmark and Share

UCS California Climate Scientist Dr. Juliet Christian-Smith provides this guest blog that celebrates today’s signing of historic California legislation to require regulation of groundwater, and offers some thoughts about the need for climate-resilient water management going forward.

Although California is known as a leader when it comes to climate change, its approach to groundwater has been more reminiscent of the Wild West. Groundwater provides around 60 percent of the state’s water supply in dry years, but it has remained largely unregulated since the Gold Rush era. Today, California took a major leap forward into the 21st century as Governor Jerry Brown signed two bills into law aimed at protecting groundwater for current and future generations.

This year’s record-breaking dry conditions shined a spotlight on the state’s out-dated approach to groundwater. Numerous articles documented a well-drilling spree, as rivers and canals dried up and as declining groundwater tables led many to sink ever-deeper wells. In parts of the Central Valley, the loss of groundwater is so great that it has altered the gravitational pull of the earth, as measured by satellites circling the globe. And as droughts are expected to become more frequent in a warming world, sustainable groundwater management is increasingly important.

Until now, California was the only state in the Western U.S. that did not comprehensively monitor or regulate groundwater. Today, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1168 (Pavley) and Assembly Bill 1739 (Dickinson), which start the process of creating a statewide system to manage groundwater. These policies require local groundwater management entities to be formed by 2017 and to adopt groundwater sustainability plans by 2020. Importantly, groundwater management entities must also measure groundwater use and report groundwater levels to the state. If a groundwater sustainability plan is not adequate or does not address long-term groundwater declines, the State Water Board can step in to ensure sustainable groundwater management.

While many will see these as common-sense measures, the opposition against these bills was fierce. Simply put, sustainable groundwater management threatens those who are benefiting from the current free-for-all. Until very recently, any mention of comprehensive groundwater monitoring or measurement in California was met with cynical sneers. Indeed, there have been numerous attempts to modernize California’s approach to groundwater over the decades, starting with the Governor’s Commission to Review Water Rights Law in 1978, which recommended a more comprehensive approach to groundwater management.

A generation later, the groundwater crisis has reached epic proportions and the state is finally stepping up to the plate, thanks in no small part to Senator Pavley, Assemblymember Dickinson, and the valiant efforts of many farmers, water agencies, academics and experts, foundations, community-based organizations, and environmental organizations who worked together to turn the tides.

While there is much to celebrate, there is also much more work to be done. In the coming years, local groundwater management entities will need to determine how to reach a sustainable water yield by 2040. Scientists, community members, and other stakeholders will need to work together to make sure that local groundwater sustainability plans are science-based, address climate change, and protect our water resources for the future. Let’s get to work!

 

 

Posted in: Food and Agriculture, Global Warming Tags: , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Gene Beley

    I still believe the state should put up a multi-million prize for any inventor who can come up with revolutionary concepts that will produce new water inexpensively. That incentive would focus our best Silicon Valley and other inventors’ brains worldwide on the subject. I’ve seen a water cooler in an office from Germany that makes water out of air. I’ve met Joseph Rizzi, a Benicia inventor who is trying to get funding to build a model of a natural desalinization plant one mile off the California coast and one half mile down, to use the ocean waves for free energy. Instead, the state thinks just spending money on the “same old, same old” will be the magic bullet. Sorry, but many of us don’t even trust the politicians to spend the money wisely if they get it. In fact, they still have money left over from the last water bond and want you to pay again for clean water for a community in the Westlands Water District that motivated people to vote for the previous water bond. Go figure.

  • Richard Solomon

    This is admittedly a big very hard fought step for Calif to take, which I supported via sending emails to the Governor. But it is only a beginning. First, ag interests will continue to work hard to undermine these policies. Second, incentives and penalties need to be developed to move ALL users of groundwater towards more efficient use of this valuable basic resource. This means residential, agricultural, industrial, and other users like municipalities and schools/universities.

    Desalination and gray water usage should also get looked at and developed seriously. I lived in Santa Barbara during the last serious drought of 1989-91. The city hurriedly built a desal plant under its emergency powers, etc. It never used the plant because of ‘miracle’ rains which came in the spring of 1991. In fact, it ended up dismantling and selling it a few years later. Then voters, foolishly in my opinion, passed a measure a year or two later to plug into the state water system when it was well known that it could never deliver the water promised to the city.

    Now here we are 20+ years later facing an even more serious drought with a greater number of people living in the State than was the case back then. As Yogi Berra would have said, ‘It is deja vu all over again.’

    UCS and our government leaders in Sacramento need to work even harder to move our State into a new, more thoughtful plane of policies and practices with water.