American Petroleum Institute Regresses with All Fossils, All the Time Plan

, senior energy analyst, Clean Energy | January 7, 2016, 3:57 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

The American Petroleum Institute’s latest annual report on energy in the U.S. is out, and it’s a step backwards on climate change. While API’s 2015 State of American Energy report for the first time touted a host of clean energy options, the 2016 one is back to all fossils, all the time. It’s time for API to come clean on clean energy and climate change.

Into the 21st century

Last year’s API report, titled Energy Tomorrow, was notable—for some, even praiseworthy—because of its inclusiveness, technology-wise. API gave space to a host of organizations to talk about a range of low-carbon energy options, including solar, wind, and energy efficiency. (The word “solar” appeared 79 times—and not just in the section written by the Solar Energy Industries Association—and pages were rife with mentions of climate change and carbon reduction.)

Credit: Duke-Energy/Creative-Commons (Flickr)

Natural gas has a potential role to play in lowering electricity costs, reducing carbon pollution and helping us transition away from coal to more renewable energy, but it’s important to recognize its limits, and soon. (Credit: Duke-Energy/Flickr)

In his cover letter to the 2015 report, API’s president Jack Gerard argued that the whole mix of technologies—not just oil and gas—“will remain essential to successfully meet America’s future energy needs.”

Back to the 20th century

Alas, this year API has forgotten everything it learned in 2015 about the importance of all those other technologies. API just merged with America’s Natural Gas Alliance, but that move seems to actually have narrowed their vision, not broadened it.

The 2016 State of American Energy report, called Vote4Energy, focuses pretty much exclusively on oil and natural gas (and… voting for oil and gas). Any discussion of climate change is suspiciously absent, and carbon reductions show up in the report in only one sentence, one that gives credit for recent reductions to—you guessed it—natural gas.

That’s a pretty radical backpedaling on where they were a year ago. API’s new report feels conspicuously outdated at a time when many of its own members are publicly calling for some form of a price on carbon. It’s a reminder that Big Oil’s money isn’t always where its mouth is when it comes to lobbying and climate change.

No more shenanigans

gw-misinformation-deception-report-cover-headline-image

The time for deception is over, API. It’s time to get real on climate science and energy.

Unfortunately, API’s history on climate change is mostly one of deception. API earned a starring role in our recent Climate Deception Dossiers report because of its efforts over many years to help deceive the public about climate science and solutions.

And newly disclosed documents show that API, with its member companies, actually knew about the potential risks of climate change as far back as the 1970s and early 1980s… but still chose to embark on a decades-long campaign of deception against climate science and solutions.

These days API finally admits, “It is clear that climate change is a serious problem….” But at the same time API is stepping up its attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, and still mispresenting natural gas as a silver bullet for addressing the problem.

The simple fact is that eliminating the Clean Power Plan and replacing it with an overreliance on natural gas is definitely not consistent with where we need to get to on cutting carbon, and is a risky gamble for consumers in potentially overreliant states.

API was moving in the right direction in its annual report last year when it recognized the role that a host of low-carbon technologies can and should play in our energy future. And they were nearly right about how to get there—with innovation and more:

With smart public policy choices and a regulatory system that supports domestic energy opportunities, the United States can realize a prosperous energy tomorrow characterized by energy abundance and economic security.

It’s important to add “and low carbon-ness” to those sentiments. But they were partway there, at least.

If API wants to be seen as a 21st-century leader in energy, they’ll do a whole lot better hewing a whole lot more closely to their 2015 messages than to their 2016 ones, and giving Americans solid, science-based information about energy and climate risks and opportunities.

It’s time for API to ditch their old ways, get out of the deception business, and get real about moving us toward a truly prosperous—and safe—energy tomorrow.

Posted in: Energy, Global Warming Tags:

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • solodoctor

    Why am I not surprised by this regression?!? Like most organizations, and people as well for that matter, API is making last ditch efforts to resist the inevitable. Change is a hard thing to accommodate to, let alone accept. Reality,along with continuing nudges from UCS and its members as well as other organizations/folks will force API to change. It’ll take time, more effort, and, unfortunately, cost more money. The longer and harder one resists the inevitable the more costly the changes become….to fossil fuel companies, the environment, and ultimately the people of the world.

    • ucsjrogers

      I think you’re right on all counts, Solo. Last year’s API report was the real surprise; we can hope that recognition of the importance of clean energy becomes the norm, even for groups like API. But may take time. So you’re right about there needing to be other forces at play, including UCS and our supporters, to help push API in that direction. And you’re also right about course corrections — for the APIs of the world, and for our economy or world as a whole — being easier to make the sooner we make them. That’s why I do what I do, and I expect the same is true for you. Thanks. – John