GMOs.


Real Scrutiny of Science and Scientists Goes Well Beyond FOIA

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

In today’s Boston Globe, reporter David Abel profiles our work to push back on those who harass scientists through open records laws. The Globe article helps prove the point that the Freedom of Information Act is inadequate to root out corruption within science while also protecting scientists from harassment. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

The Public Interest Lies in Promoting Transparency AND Protecting Scientists from Harassment

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

On Sunday, the New York Times published an op-ed from Paul Thacker, a former Senate staffer who is critical of UCS’s efforts to protect scientists from harassment. Unfortunately, he misrepresents our work, as he did previously in a PLOS Biology op-ed that was ultimately retracted (to our surprise, while we were corresponding with an editor about corrections to the piece). Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Yes, We Can Defend Scientists from Harassment AND Increase Transparency

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

We’ve written extensively about the use of open records laws to harass scientists for the past couple years and encouraged governments, academic institutions, and journalists to address the challenge of balancing accountability and academic freedom. The issue has taken on a new dimension in recent weeks, as high profile releases have brought significant attention to the work of academics throughout the country. Will this prompt institutions to figure out better solutions? Read more >

Bookmark and Share

More Herbicide, or More Innovative, Sustainable Farming?

, former senior scientist, Food and Environment

As another growing season begins, production agriculture is confronted with important choices. Among them is whether the farming community and policy makers will heed the clear warnings from herbicide-resistant weeds that industrial monoculture farming methods are not sustainable. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

USDA to Tackle 2,4-D-Resistant Engineered Crops Without Needed Regulations

, former senior scientist, Food and Environment

It is encouraging that USDA will produce an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for crops resistant to 2,4-D or dicamba. These crops, through the herbicides they are designed to use, have potential to cause substantial environmental and human harm, especially due to drift and volatility. Weed scientists have projected dramatically increased use of these herbicides, and herbicides in general, if these crops are approved. Read more >

Bookmark and Share