Scientific Integrity


Baltimore against the Measles: A Victory for Science, but for How Long?

, former analyst, Center for Science & Democracy

When I was an undergraduate at Johns Hopkins University, I had only a dim awareness of the measles outbreak then raging through Baltimore. I was fully vaccinated, spent most of my time on campus, and lived in university housing among mostly white, middle and upper-middle class students, who were also fully vaccinated. Measles, for me, was a remote thing, despite its proximity. It didn’t happen to anyone I knew. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

EPA Relaxes the Leash on Independent Science Advisors

, , Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

The EPA has taken steps to reaffirm the free speech rights of independent scientists who advise the agency, backing away from a memorandum that invited criticism from science and journalism groups late this summer. A clarification of EPA policy has been sent to scientists on the EPA Science Advisory Board and other agency committees that provide scientific analysis and advice and posted on the EPA website. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

The Not-So-Sweet Relief: How The Soda Industry Is Influencing Medical Organizations

Richard Bruno, MD and Kevin Burns, MD
, , UCS

With increasing scrutiny over the dire health consequences of sugar-sweetened beverages, soda manufacturers have turned to obscuring the science, confusing the consumer, and sponsoring medical organizations whose recommendations influence both providers and patients. Unfortunately these corporate partnerships are conflicts of interest that undermine the credibility of the organizations and stymie reform. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Update: EPA Will Review Troublesome Communications Policy for Independent Science Advisory Board

, , Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

Last week, UCS joined other science and journalism organizations in a letter to the EPA expressing concern about how a new policy might limit the ability of independent scientists who advise the agency to speak publicly about their scientific research and opinions in a personal capacity, particularly the scientists who serve on its Science Advisory Board. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Is EPA Excessively Restricting Access to its Science Advisory Board Members?

, , director, Center for Science & Democracy

UCS learned recently that at a closed-door meeting of the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) on July 24, the EPA put forward a new memorandum from EPA Chief of Staff Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming that seems to extend free speech restrictions to independent scientists who advise the agency. The memo is written in a way that could discourage scientists from informing public discussion around important topics. Read more >

Bookmark and Share