Scientific Integrity


The Not-So-Sweet Relief: How The Soda Industry Is Influencing Medical Organizations

Richard Bruno, MD and Kevin Burns, MD
, , UCS

With increasing scrutiny over the dire health consequences of sugar-sweetened beverages, soda manufacturers have turned to obscuring the science, confusing the consumer, and sponsoring medical organizations whose recommendations influence both providers and patients. Unfortunately these corporate partnerships are conflicts of interest that undermine the credibility of the organizations and stymie reform. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Update: EPA Will Review Troublesome Communications Policy for Independent Science Advisory Board

, , program manager, Center for Science & Democracy

Last week, UCS joined other science and journalism organizations in a letter to the EPA expressing concern about how a new policy might limit the ability of independent scientists who advise the agency to speak publicly about their scientific research and opinions in a personal capacity, particularly the scientists who serve on its Science Advisory Board. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Is EPA Excessively Restricting Access to its Science Advisory Board Members?

, , director, Center for Science & Democracy

UCS learned recently that at a closed-door meeting of the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) on July 24, the EPA put forward a new memorandum from EPA Chief of Staff Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming that seems to extend free speech restrictions to independent scientists who advise the agency. The memo is written in a way that could discourage scientists from informing public discussion around important topics. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Three Major Mistakes the House Science Committee Chairman Made in the Wall Street Journal

, , director, Center for Science & Democracy

Yesterday, the House Science Committee approved the Secret Science Reform Act on a party line vote.  The bill purports to provide full access to the scientific basis for EPA decision making, but in fact it is a sham call for government transparency when its effect is nothing of the kind. On the contrary, numerous open government groups, including UCS,  have raised concerns about the legislation. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

After Doubling Down on Scientific Integrity, EPA Ditches Its Science Advisor

, , program manager, Center for Science & Democracy

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy has ditched her science advisor, Glenn Paulson. The move came the day after she gave a major address at the National Academies of Science, telling the audience that “[t]he work we do together to preserve the integrity of our science is as critical as ever.” Dr. Paulson’s departure from this position is a loss for the agency, and the position should be filled quickly to ensure that progress on scientific integrity can continue. Read more >

Bookmark and Share