El Niño vs. the Arctic: Which Will Dominate This Year’s Winter Weather?

, senior climate scientist | December 21, 2015, 2:51 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

This past week, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2015 annual meeting was abuzz with discussion of El Niño 3.4 and the Arctic Oscillation. No wonder. These indicators are clues to how major competing factors may play out this winter in the northern hemisphere.

The autumn conditions (October to November) rank as the third largest El Niño since 1950. (Between June and September, El Niño logged the second strongest conditions since 1950.)

Other news released during the AGU meeting was just as remarkable. The latest Arctic Report Card monitoring year (October 2014 to September 2015) broke the hottest Arctic land temperature annual average since 1900.

Five key indicators to watch this winter

Will El Niño stay strong and bring drought relief for California? Will cold outbreaks penetrate into the continental U.S.?

To help answer these and other questions, scientists are paying close attention to five key indicators—and to how these powerful forces interact, evolve, and help shape this winter’s weather.

1. The MEI—Will El Niño dominate the early part of the winter?

Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI)

The multivariate El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Index (MEI) is based on the six observed variables over the tropical Pacific: sea-level pressure, zonal and meridional components of the surface wind, sea surface temperature, surface air temperature, and total cloudiness fraction of the sky. The red (positive values) are El Niño and the blue (negative values) are La Niña. Source: NOAA/ESRL

2. Precipitation patterns

Will the El Niño precipitation patterns be typical for the winter in the U.S?

Wintertime pattern El Niño

The wintertime pattern during El Niño conditions typically bring precipitation to the southern region of the continental U.S. The Northern U.S. states, in contrast, can be unseasonaby mild and drier. Figure Source: NOAA

3. Arctic temperature

How do the temperatures north of 60 degrees latitude influence the sea ice during the summer and the stratospheric polar vortex in the following winter?

Arctic Report Card 2015 Temperature

A record-breaking polar year for the Arctic is an indicator of how the region north of 60 degrees latitude is warming faster than the global average. Graphic: Dan Pisut/NOAA

4. Arctic Oscillation Index

A positive Arctic Oscillation (AO) number indicates a pattern with strong winds that tend to circulate counterclockwise around the pole at 55 degrees North latitude. These strong winds tend to keep the cold air in the Arctic. A negative AO number indicates weaker winds that are more likely to become distorted and allow colder air to penetrate into lower latitudes.

Daily Arctic Oscillation Index

Daily Arctic Oscillation (AO) Index. Graphic: NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC), September 2015 through December 20, 2015.

5. 500 hPa geopotential height contours

Weather tends to follow the direction of winds around 5.5 km above sea level, or at the 500 hPa geopotential height. This indicates the upper level pattern, such as discussed in this synoptic weather discussion.  Temperature at 850 hPa, around 1.5 km above sea level, indicates frontal zones.  These charts can be used to see how much of the cold air is contained near the North Pole or if the pattern leads to cold outbreaks to lower latitudes.  

Temperature 850 hPa and geopotential height 500 hPa 21 Dec 2015

Northern hemisphere geopotential height at 500 hPa (contours) and temperature at 850 hPa (color shading). A hectopascal (hPa) is a unit of pressure that is equivalent to millibar. Graphic: ECMWF

I’m dreaming of a warm Christmas

Unseasonably warm December conditions are dashing records and creating fun antics and some unnerving impacts on inhabitants across the Eastern U.S., as reported by my colleague Erika Spanger-Siegfried. All signs point to the El Niño pattern continuing to dominate the end of December with the potential for delivering some rain or snow to drought-stricken California and a high probability of a warmer than normal Christmas in the U.S. northeast.

However, there may be a need to keep those winter coats in the front of the closet. Some scientific indicators suggest a January 2016 weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, increasing the chance for severe late winter weather over the continents. For a recent history and updated overview of how the stratospheric polar vortex and tropospheric polar jet stream can influence winter extremes check out this update by my colleagues Astrid Caldas and Matt Heid.

Posted in: Global Warming Tags: , , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • EmmettGrogan

    If the polar vortex weakens, why would it get colder?? The author doesn’t explain that. My scientist husband wants to know how that could happen.

  • Sometimes backing away a bit makes the picture clearer.

    Carbon dioxide has been erroneously suspected of being a
    forcing on global temperature. Compelling evidence, CO2 has no effect on
    climate requires only (1) Understanding that temperature changes with the
    integral of the net forcing (not directly with the instantaneous value of the
    forcing itself). And (2) all life depends ultimately on photosynthesis which
    requires CO2.

    The 542 million
    years of evolution on land required substantial atmospheric CO2. The
    integral of CO2 (or a function thereof) for 542 million years could not
    consistently result in today’s temperature. Documented in a peer reviewed paper
    at Energy & Environment, vol. 26, no. 5, 841-845 and also at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com which also identifies the two factors that explain climate change (97% match since before 1900).