It’s not surprising, but America’s retired military officers are sounding the alarm on America’s dangerous dependence on oil. In an OpEd published on Nov. 2 in The Hill, retired four-star General Paul Kern, U.S. Army (Ret.) and Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, U.S. Navy (Ret.) called for the country to cuts its oil dependence 30 percent within the next decade. They pointed out the very real national security, economic, and environmental consequences of our country’s oil dependence. Specifically, they state:
“America’s dependence on oil constitutes a significant threat– economically, geo-politically, environmentally, and militarily. What President Bush called our oil “addiction” ties our hands in the foreign policy arena. It forces us to depend on countries that do not share our values, and increases the risk of troops being sent into harm’s way. We also send a billion dollars to other countries for oil every day—money that could be far better spent at home.”
I imagine that General Kern and Vice Admiral Gunn would have some good additions to the ideas laid out in my previous blog for how to better use that $1 billion a day we spend on foreign oil.
The UCS oil savings plan would break America’s oil dependence
As the OpEd points out, there are no silver bullets solutions to America’s oil dependence. Instead, General Kern and Vice Admiral Gunn rightly state that we need a wide range of solutions. Since transportation accounts for the vast majority of our oil consumption, we need to boost the fuel efficiency of our vehicles, deploy alternative fuels, such as electricity and low-carbon biofuels, and develop transportation systems that provide alternatives to driving.
UCS has a plan that would put these solutions to work and cut America’s projected oil use in half by 2030. We have the technology to move beyond oil as our dominant transportation fuel. Taking this step would deliver tremendous economic, national security, and environmental benefits. All we need is a smart national energy policy to get us there. As this OpEd makes clear, it’s not a question of whether we should take this step forward. It’s how soon can we get started?
Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.