A recent opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) from 16 scientists and engineers has gotten a lot of attention on our blog and elsewhere. The scientists and engineers basically urged candidates for public office to ignore the growing problem of climate change. But they are far from representative of the scientific and engineering communities.
In fact, just last month, 161 scientists and engineers in California alone signed an open letter in support of the state’s efforts to reduce heat-trapping emissions from cars and trucks. And these scientists and engineers are themselves just a representative sample of the broad consensus on climate science and the availability of solutions.
Denying the Facts Does Not Change Them
Peter Frumhoff, the chief scientist for our climate campaign, already cited a variety of resources in his blog post on the WSJ piece that set the record straight on climate science and the economics of addressing the problem. The California scientists and engineers relied on their own work as well as many of the same resources and boiled it down this way:
“The causes and risks of climate change are clear and well documented.”
“Cars, trucks, and other mobile sources account for nearly 40 percent of these [heat-trapping] emissions in California.”
“The longer we wait to bring down emissions, the harder and more costly it will be to limit climate change impacts and to adapt to those that cannot be avoided.”
“We already have the solutions and technology to start significantly reducing emissions.”
Solving the Problem Will Be Good for Public Health and the Economy
The letter from the California scientists and engineers was delivered to the California Air Resources Board (ARB) on the day before it unanimously voted to adopt strong global warming pollution standards, smog standards, electric car standards, and hydrogen infrastructure requirements. It was also delivered to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which are setting national standards that will cut heat-trapping emissions from new cars and light trucks in half by 2025.
California’s package of initiatives will save residents $22 billion through 2025, according to ARB analysis. By 2025, the program will create 21,000 new jobs across the state as consumers spend less on gasoline and shift that money to more productive parts of the economy. Individual consumers will save $4,000 over the life of the typical car sold in 2025, even after paying for clean car technology. The added cost of the technology improvements would be fully recovered from fuel savings within the first three years of owning the vehicle.
Ignoring the Problem Won’t Make it Go Away
At UCS we strongly believe that the scientists and engineers who wrote the WSJ piece have every right to state their personal opinions, but the facts simply are not on their side.
Making matters worse, the implications of following their advice to effectively ignore the problem of global warming are dangerous. Climate change threatens our health and our welfare, and you can already see the impacts around the nation and the world.
If we instead listen to the California scientists and engineers (and many others), if we face up to the facts on climate change and get moving on the solutions, we can get on a path to slow, and eventually stop, global warming while saving consumers and businesses a lot of money.
To learn more, check our our Climate 2030 Blueprint which demonstrates how Americans can save $464 billion in 2030 alone from smart solutions to climate change.
And if you are a scientist, engineer, or economist working on the problems and solutions associated with climate change, please lend your voice to the debate and sign up with us.
Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.