Arizonans Stand Up for Solar Power

, Senior energy analyst | November 14, 2013, 5:46 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

In July, I blogged about a proposal that Arizona Public Service (APS) submitted to its regulator, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), to dramatically reduce incentives to install solar panels on homes and businesses. On Wednesday more than 100 people descended on ACC to protest it. The event kicked off two days of hearings that will decide whether to maintain Arizona’s existing net metering policy, which allows solar customers to receive credit on their electricity bills for each kilowatt-hour of electricity generated by their solar panels.

Update (Nov. 15): Yesterday afternoon, the ACC voted 3-2 to maintain a solar net metering program, with a fee on rooftop solar customers of $0.70 per kilowatt (kW) installed. The fee will be imposed on new solar customers and is far less than that proposed by APS, which was in the $5.00 per kW range. The reduced fee is seen as a compromise, but it makes Arizona the first state to target rooftop solar customers with new fees.  Greentech Media reports that some in the solar industry believe this new charge is a slippery slope.


Photo: U.S. Department of Energy

A whopping 43 states plus the District of Columbia have adopted net metering policies, which has had a huge impact on the number of people going solar across the country.

In Arizona, the number of installed solar systems in APS’s service territory has increased from just 900 in 2009 to more than 18,000 today, and the ACC attributes much of this growth to the success of net metering.

A Republican pollster from Public Opinion Strategies named Glen Bolder recently surveyed 300 Arizonans, and found that 81 percent opposed APS’s proposal to reduce net metering incentives. Notably, 77 percent would be less likely to vote for a candidate who ends solar savings. While 300 people is just a small sample of the state’s population, those numbers are consistent with national polling showing Americans favor solar over all other energy types.

UCS supporters are among the thousands of Arizonans who have taken action to tell the ACC to protect solar. In October, ACC staff listened and recommended that the utility’s request be rejected so that the issue can be taken up during the next hearing on APS rates in 2015. The memorandum from ACC staff also emphasized that the benefits of solar, such as avoiding fossil fuel costs, are integral to the conversation, and concluded that the value of these benefits can best be determined in the context of a general rate case.

When all the relevant facts can be considered, APS deserves props for the progress it is making on solar, including the innovative Solona project that provides solar power even when the sun does not shine. But APS has admitted to funding groups behind ideological attacks on solar in Arizona, including a fact-check-failing ad attempting to deceive Arizonans about the cost of net metering to non-solar customers. Many of the groups siding with APS are known for their history of climate denial, including the Edison Electric Institute and 60 Plus Association. Just last year, 60 Plus urged members of Congress to “oppose confirmation of any adherent of ‘global warming’ to the EPA.”

Recent headlines have highlighted “unlikely” support for solar policies from conservatives. In Arizona, it is easy to see why this support is actually not at all surprising. One APS proposal “removes a basic choice from the customer,” according to ACC staff, while another “denies the residential customer the right to offset energy purchases from the utility with self-generation on a one-to-one basis.”

Still, the outcome of Arizona’s solar debate could have far reaching implications. APS recently rejoined the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the same fossil fuel-funded group behind this year’s failed attacks on state renewable energy standards. As ALEC looks to weigh in on net metering, signs point to state solar policies as the next target of fossil fuel funded think tanks and advocacy groups.

The final decision could be made as soon as today by ACC’s elected commissioners, which means you still have time to take action by clicking here. Tell the ACC to maintain Arizona’s successful solar incentives!

Posted in: Energy Tags: , , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Thomas Jablonka

    I like the idea of all kinds of alternative power. I think Those who use the grid should help pay for it. like those who use the roads should help pay for them. I also think the fee schedual should be fair. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Every body should pay their fair share.

    • Stormy Rose

      Those with solar panels already pay their share. I paid for and maintain solar panels. All net metering does is credit me for the energy I produce instead of paying for it. If I produce MORE energy than I use a specific month, I still have to pay SRP $18, because EVERY user pays the base rate.

      Once a year, the system is cleared, and if there is electricity still on my credit, I only get 3cents a kilowatt hour. Every month, if I use more than I am credited, I PAY SRP at least three times that amount.

      Net metering making solar people NOT pay for electricity is a LIE that APS has been perpetuating.

  • APS should not be allowed to belong to an organization like ALEC which has a CLEARLY POLITICAL MOTIVE for existence. Membership in ALEC positions APS as a as a partisan player in Arizona’s economy, when they are supposed to be nothing more than a PUBLIC SERVICE company. Their membership in ALEC should be considered a flagrant violation of their charter as a public service!!!

    This message should be incorporated into a petition that the Union of Concerned Scientists and other environmentally responsible organizations can ask their members and associates to sign and forward to the Arizona Corporation Commission.

    Thank you, Harley Armentrout

  • What? Did they compared to Georgia?