On Mental Health and Guns, Experts Ordered Not to Contradict President Trump’s Lies

, former deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy | August 21, 2019, 2:06 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

As people searched for answers around the shootings in El Paso and Dayton, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services prevented its scientists from posting relevant research about guns, violence, and mental health on social media. According to the Washington Post, which broke the story, the orders came in the wake of the president’s incorrect suggestion that mental illness leads to mass shootings.

The president’s remarks harm our ability to address gun violence by misplacing the blame. But they also needlessly marginalize people with mental illness, making it less likely that they will seek help and more likely that they will be viewed with suspicion. The evidence shows that a minority of mass shooters have diagnosed mental illness. Instead, they are more likely to have “a strong sense of resentment, desire for notoriety, obsession with other shooters, a history of domestic violence, narcissism and access to firearms,” reports the Post.

But the public relations people at HHS didn’t think it was their job to help you learn more about the causes of mass violence. They didn’t care about increasing stigma for people with mental illness. They thought it was more important to protect the president’s untruths.

In other words, as we experience hundreds of multiple-victim shootings per year, and as many thousands take their own lives, it was more important to the public affairs folks for President Trump to save face than for scientists to tell us what they know. And the CDC and National Institutes of Health can’t tell you about what the science says about health.

“There is this climate of concern whether you can make a statement based on facts,” a NIH employee told the Post. “I see people struggling with how to interpret it. What are we allowed to do?”

If there’s ever a time to clarify these expectations, it is now. The Scientific Integrity Act before Congress would provide federal experts with legal protections for sharing facts with the American people.

When I testified before Congress about this important legislation, I spoke about how federal government scientists do not feel empowered to share their expertise publicly. This is simply one more data point to show that when scientists are muzzled, our health and safety suffer.

By now, federal government scientists know that when the president lies, they should keep their mouths shut. They face ever-increasing restrictions on their ability to speak with reporters and share scientific information with the public.

We should be able to hear what research shows about gun violence and homegrown terrorist attacks. Only then can we have an informed discussion about how to stop them. Profound gun violence research restrictions already leave us in the dark. And censoring scientists from sharing what we do know makes it even worse.

We are under attack by people in our own country. Our president has become like so many other politicians in his unwillingness to acknowledge what is behind the carnage. And now, federal agency scientists are expected to fall in line and walk in lock step. This is not how we stop people from dying.


Posted in: Science and Democracy, Scientific Integrity Tags: , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Mbfarrel

    The Trumpian version of Bookburning

  • Nancy Hodgeson

    I had no idea the science was censored and his lies about the cause being mental illness is allow to grow, when all data shows that these are home grown terrorists, white supremacists. All research shows people with mental illnesses are much less likely to commit violent acts. They are more likely to be victims. I was shocked when he called us monsters, and now the evidence proving he is wrong is being censored. How can we come together as a country and stop the massacres if the cause is hidden?

    • Lucifer.Morningstar

      It would require a massive amount of scientists to openly defy their hush orders and post en masse and have the spine and courage of their convictions and willingness to lose their jobs/funding/tenure/etc.The corroborating evidence would exonerate them and get the word out to the masses. They would be humanity’s heroes. But, by signing NDAs, they have already declared themselves willingly obfuscating cowards.