Congress Prevents Wind Industry from Falling Off Cliff

, director of energy research, Clean Energy | January 2, 2013, 6:47 pm EDT
Bookmark and Share

I’m pleased to report that it didn’t take long to achieve one of my new year’s resolutions for Congress – extending the federal tax credits for wind power and other renewable energy sources. The deal to avert the so-called “fiscal cliff” that passed the Senate and the House yesterday, and is expected to be signed by the President, includes an important extension of federal tax credits for wind and other renewable energy projects that begin construction in 2013. This will temporarily help the wind industry from going off its own cliff. Happy New Year indeed!

As UCS President Kevin Knobloch recently indicated in a response to Sen. Alexander (R-TN), extending the tax credits for renewable energy is very good news for the U.S. economy. It could save 37,000 jobs, or nearly half of the 75,000 workers currently employed in the industry, according to the American Wind Energy Association. It will also help keep the nearly 500 domestic wind turbine and components manufacturing facilities humming. These facilities are producing more than two-thirds of the equipment installed in the U.S., up from 35 percent in 2005.

Wind power sets new record in 2012

While the final numbers are not in yet, it is clear that the U.S. set a new record in 2012 by installing more than 12,000 megawatts (MW) of new wind capacity.  This made wind power America’s leading source of new electric generation capacity, representing 45 percent of total capacity additions. Wind even beat out natural gas, which came in a distant second at 30 percent. <

The new wind facilities installed in 2012 represented an investment of more than $21 billion in the U.S. economy, based on preliminary 2012 data on average installed costs from the U.S. Department of Energy. The tax credits, combined with state renewable electricity standards and other policies that are driving these investments, are also making wind power more competitive with natural gas and other energy sources. The DOE report also shows that installed costs have declined by about 20 percent over the past two years.

America still needs a long-term renewable energy policy

While the short-term tax credit extension is worth cheering about, it will only provide temporary relief to the wind industry and other renewable energy sources. Because it can often take 18-24 months to develop a wind project, secure financing, and sign a power purchase agreement, U.S. wind development is expected to be slow in 2013. In addition, many wind component manufacturers have already laid people off and orders have slowed down because of the long delay in extending the credit.

With the fiscal cliff temporarily averted and the tax credit extension behind them, it’s time for Congress to pursue my other new year’s resolutions. Strong long-term policy support at both the state and national levels is essential to ensure continued growth of the renewable energy industry, create new jobs, lower costs, and overcome market barriers.

Adopting a strong national standard for renewable electricity is one important policy to accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Twenty-nine states and 18 countries are already successfully demonstrating that this is an effective and affordable approach. Targeted incentives and increased funding for research and development are also important for lowering the costs of renewable energy technologies.

A national commitment to deliver deep cuts in carbon and other heat-trapping emissions is also critical to avoid the worst impacts of climate change and to help level the playing field between fossil fuels and cleaner, low carbon energy sources. In a statement yesterday, President Obama said that the fiscal cliff deal will allow him and the incoming Congress to focus on other priorities in 2013, including “protecting our planet from the harmful effects of climate change, [and] boosting domestic energy production.” Fortunately, renewable energy is well suited to accomplish both these objectives.

Posted in: Energy, Global Warming Tags: , , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • John Nichols

    If it’s not green and renewable, don’t put public money into it. Don’t use public money for dirty power. We need zero emissions and not coal, oil or natural gas. Instead, support wind, solar, hydrogen production and installation.

  • Monty Knudsen

    While I am a strong supporter of wind energy and other renewables, I also strongly support the need for carefully sited facilities. In particular, siting that does a thorough evaluation of the environmental impacts to our natural resources. I believe the wind industry as a whole does a fair job of this but there is much room for improvement and more rigorous self policing. I also believe that there is a critical need for stronger National Policy in this area. I would like to see a stronger commitment on the part of all renewable energy industries to undertake rigorous evaluations of their impacts on natural resources. Many of our native plants and animals are losing their habitats at an alarming rate to all forms of human development. While renewable energy is clean it isn’t necessarily green. Let’s make it as green as possible.