censorship


Former NOAA Officials File Scientific Integrity Complaint over Trump Attacks on Weather Forecasters

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

Three former high-ranking NOAA officials filed an official complaint yesterday asking for a comprehensive investigation into multiple violations of the NOAA Scientific Integrity Policy. “Recent actions to censor NWS scientists put public safety at risk, are inconsistent with NOAA’s scientific integrity principles, violate the public trust, and compromise the independence and reliability of the National Weather Service.” Read more >

Bookmark and Share

NOAA Officials Threatened with Firing After Dorian Trump Tweet Fiasco

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

Senior NOAA political staff objected to orders to “fix” weather forecasts to conform with the president’s claim that Hurricane Dorian would impact Alabama, the New York Times reports. Then Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross threatened to fire them.

Read more >

NOAA
Bookmark and Share

Scientists Ordered to Keep Quiet During Hurricane Dorian to Help President Save Face

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

NOAA leadership prioritized the president’s precious feelings and fragile ego over the health and welfare of the people who were in Dorian’s path. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

On Mental Health and Guns, Experts Ordered Not to Contradict President Trump’s Lies

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

As people searched for answers around the shootings in El Paso and Dayton, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services prevented its scientists from posting relevant research about guns, violence, and mental health on social media. According to the Washington Post, which broke the story, the orders came in the wake of the president’s incorrect suggestion that mental illness leads to mass shootings. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Image: C-SPAN

Censoring a Senior Analyst at the State Department for Telling the Truth is a Damned Shame

, director, Center for Science & Democracy

Think of it. You are an accomplished scientist in academia and decide to serve your country by going into public service. You do your job, advising the State Department, the Administration and Congress on critical security risks like climate change, based on a huge amount of well-established evidence. But then the White House censors your testimony to the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, apparently on the theory that if it doesn’t get in the Congressional Record the risks will dissipate. What do you do? Read more >

Bookmark and Share