secret science


Now Is the Time To Halt the EPA’s Restrictions on Science

, director, Center for Science & Democracy

YOU can submit a comment into the public record that the EPA is obligated to consider. And now is the time! For this proposal, the comment period is only 30 days—and it’s over at the end of May. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

What Happened During the Hasty White House Review of EPA’s Science Restriction Rule?

, science and policy analyst, Center for Science and Democracy

We already know that the production of Administrator Scott Pruitt’s rule to restrict science at the EPA was purely political, but it’s possible that there’s a whole new layer of politics that went on at the White House level as well. Read more >

Photo: Matthew Platt/CC BY-SA (Flickr)
Bookmark and Share

Six Things You Should Know About The EPA’s New Science Restriction Draft Policy

, Research Director, Center for Science and Democracy

Yesterday, the EPA unveiled a long-awaited policy changing how the EPA can use science in its decision making. Ostensibly about “transparency”, the policy will actually restrict the agency’s ability to use the best available science—and thereby weaken protections for public health and the environment. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

A List of Scientific Organizations That Have Supported and Opposed Limiting What Research EPA Can Use to Make Decisions

, Deputy director, Center for Science & Democracy

The EPA today will announce a politically-motivated draft policy to restrict the use of science in agency decisions. The draft policy is based on legislation that has died in Congress for several years. Read more >

Bookmark and Share

Photo: US Department of Defense

Here are the “Transparency” Policy Documents the EPA Does Not Want You to See

, Washington representative, Center for Science and Democracy

On April 17th, the Union of Concerned Scientists obtained EPA records through three separate Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demonstrating that a proposed Trojan horse “transparency” policy that would restrict the agency’s ability to use the best available science in decision-making is driven by politics, not science. The records also embarrassingly showed EPA officials were more concerned about the release of industry trade secrets than they were about sensitive private medical information.

Read more >

Bookmark and Share